.

City Council Votes to Repeal Ban on Pot Shops

Council members, in voting to repeal the law, said it was time to go back to the drawing board on regulating the city's nearly 1,000 pot shops.

The Los Angeles City Council tentatively voted Tuesday to repeal the ban it imposed on storefront medical marijuana dispensaries about 2 1/2 months ago.

The City Council in July approved an ordinance that banned all storefront medical marijuana dispensaries but allowed patients and licensed caregivers to grow their own cannabis. The so-called "gentle ban" ordinance also allowed three or fewer parties to collectively grow pot.

The Committee to Protect Patients and Neighborhoods -- a coalition of medical marijuana advocates comprising Americans for Safe Access, the Greater Los Angeles Collective Alliance and United Food and Commercial Workers Local 770 -- subsequently gathered the necessary 27,425 signatures needed to put a referendum of the law on a city election ballot.

Conceding that a referendum was sure to pass, the council voted 11-2 in favor of repealing the law instead of putting it to voters.

Because the vote was not unanimous, the repeal measure must to come back for a simple majority vote of the 15-member body next week. Council members Jose Huizar and Joe Buscaino favored letting voters decide whether to repeal the gentle ban.

The council's vote came after an impassioned plea from Councilman Bill Rosendahl, who has been using marijuana as he battles cancer.

"On the 20th of July, I had an MRI that was very, very serious, and the bottom line on that was, they didn't give me much time to live. And I said no, no, no, no. I'm not ready to go. I certainly want to live a long time," Rosendahl said. "If I can't get marijuana and it's medically prescribed, what do I do? What do all the people who have health issues and have been relying on it?"

Rosendahl attacked President Barack Obama's decision last year to start going after medical marijuana dispensaries. Federal authorities last week initiated the closure of 68 pot shops, including some in Eagle Rock and downtown.

"Frankly, Obama did a disservice when he turned around and said, 'Oh, well, it's OK.' Then he brings in his attorneys and starts closing them. So he didn't get his message straight with himself."

Also today, council members approved a resolution sponsored by City Council President Herb Wesson that asks the Legislature to fix state law to give municipalities clear guidelines on how to regulate the distribution of medical marijuana.

The existing law "fails to respond to fundamental issues and ... has been inappropriately used as a legal shield to stymie local governments from solving many resulting problems," according to Wesson's resolution.

Marijuana advocates hailed the expected repeal, saying it would allow safe access for critically ill cancer, AIDS and other sick patients.

"We think this is a very good first step in getting to a place where the city could appropriately regulate dispensaries and also provide safe access for patients," said Rigoberto Valdez Jr., director of organizing for UFCW Local 770, which represents about 500 workers at 50 marijuana dispensaries.

However, council members were divided on what the repeal actually means for dispensaries and agreed more needs to be done.

Councilman Mitch Englander said the repeal effectively makes every dispensary in the city illegal.

"As of today, there is nothing on the books that allows them," he said.

Englander also introduced a motion that asks for a report from the LAPD and the Department of Building and Safety to report on how the departments will pursue enforcing "existing zoning regulations," which Englander said do not allow for pot shops.

Councilman Paul Koretz, however, said very little will change if the ordinance is finally repealed. He urged swift passage of an ordinance he sponsored that would allow about 125 dispensaries that were open before Sept. 14, 2007, when the city placed a moratorium on new dispensaries, to remain open under strict regulations governing location, hours of operation and security.

Ron Smith October 02, 2012 at 09:44 PM
the city is always looking for revenue, tax it and get the budget closer to not being a deficit. seems like a simple fix, but once the city council gets involved it will appoint a committee to see the cause and effect and how many crimes were near the shops, which is always a misnomer, they are so afraid of what the moral majority will think or say..
Laura October 02, 2012 at 09:51 PM
Good. There was nothing gentle about that ban. Lets hope this results in more sensible regulation that preserves access for the people who need it.
antonioV October 02, 2012 at 10:31 PM
Medical marijuanna is garbage chemical marijuanna get rid of all medical what a scam
Spunky1 October 03, 2012 at 09:11 PM
I agree with the availability of marijuana for people in need, but do we need the outrageous number of dispensaries that exist now? Anyone who says "yes" needs to think a bit more rationally. I live in North Hollywood and I use the dispensaries, but I also see a blatant overkill. In addition, I live right next to one, and from the things I see and hear, the problems that people sweep under the rug aren't in any way minor. I do hope - and will fight for - "more sensible regulation," because right now it's out of control. A great source of revenue for the city? Sure. But blatant disregard for proper operating procedures and oversight? Let's fix it.
yjnqaz October 29, 2012 at 09:46 AM
“Republicans can do it,” said http://www.coachoutletmls.com Jennifer Duffy, a Senate political analyst at the nonpartisan Cook Political Report. “It’s just getting a http://www.hermesbeltsoutletns.net lot harder.” Rob Jesmer, the executive director of the National http://www.coachfactoryoutletion.com Republican Senatorial Committee, said Thursday that Republican candidates were within http://www.coachfactoryonlinemb.com reach of victory in 10 to 12 competitive races, with Mr. Romney’s improvement in the polls http://www.coachoutletonlineef.org lifting candidates in states that were out of play six weeks ago.But time is dwindling. The implications for the next http://www.coachoutletonlineeu.net two years cannot be overstated. If Mr. Obama wins a second term, his hand would be much strengthened http://www.coachfactorystorebg.org by a Democratic-led Senate, even a narrowly divided one, as opposed to unified Republican http://www.coachoutletonlinetpc.net majorities in the House and the Senate.At the moment, Democrats are given little chance of winning the http://www.coachoutlethcs.com net 25 seats they would need to take the House, though they could well gain House seats.If Mr. Romney wins the White House, even a one-seat Democratic http://www.coachoutletb1.com
ddddd October 30, 2012 at 10:00 AM
There is little http://www.coachoutletonlineoe.com/ Coach Factory Onlinedispute that for Mr. Obama to at least come close enough to matching his 2008 coalition to win he will need http://www.louisvuittonbeltspc.com/ Louis Vuitton Beltto induce people to vote in a way he did not have to four years ago, before the full impact of the Connect With http://www.coachoutletsstorebm.com/ Coach Outlet StoreUs on TwitterGreatRecessionRelatfollowed by intensive partisan wrangling. Mr. Obama’s aides here said they http://www.guccibeltsmh.com/ Gucci Belthad prepared for the need to rebuild his coalition all along, and that is why they have kept careful tabs on his former http://www.coachouletbtf.com/ Coach Factory Outlet Onlinesupporters, and worked to identify potential new ones, since he took office, all the while perfecting ways to keep track of them, http://www.coachoutletuse.net/ Coach Factory Storekeep in touch with them, and, ultimately, persuade them to vote. The campaign is refocusing its advertising http://www.coachoutletb1.com/ Coach Factory Onlineto scare less motivated supporters to vote. One new ad presents a reminder of Al Gore’s loss to George W. Bush http://www.coachoutlethcs.com/ Coach Factory Outletin the Florida recount of 2000, which, the ad says, made “the difference between what was, and what could have been.” http://www.coachoutletonlinetpc.net/ Coach Outlet OnlineBut ultimately
heuo November 06, 2012 at 03:03 AM
The state railway, Deutsche Bahn, operates http://www.outletcoachstoday.com what it calls - using the English that http://www.coachoutletod.com infuriates language purists - a Call a Bike scheme. http://www.coachs-outletcar.com There is a bank of red bikes outside the station. On the bike, http://www.coachoutletdp.com there's a telephone number which you call, and http://www.coachoutletwo.com the voice at the other end gives you a code to http://www.coachfactoryoutletsp.com unlock the bike.When you've finished, you lock it http://www.coachfactoryoutletli.net to something fixed and call the number with a code and somebody picks it up. http://www.coachfactoryoutletce.org You will be charged eight cents a minute.But most of us have our own bikes. We http://www.coachoutletonlinelc.net do not wear helmets. It is foolish, but we don't. I always mean to - but I http://www.coachoutletonlinesc.com don't. I realise that the brain is man's second favourite organ - but I still http://www.coachoutletonlinelsa.com leave my helmet behind.There is an argument now that if cities insist on http://www.louisvuittonoutletct.com helmets for bike-hire schemes, then people simply don't ride bikes. And if http://www.louisvuittonoutletti.org people don't ride bikes, then they're less fit and that means that more of them http://www.coachoutletrf.com die of heart-attacks.On this argument, insisting on helmets raises the overall death.

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something