Hundreds Weigh in on Universal Evolution Project

The meeting is devoted for the Planning Committee to gather input.

Some dissed Harry Potter. Many dissed traffic congestion and digital billboards. Some talked about bat populations, periodic explosions, and a mountain lion looking for a mate.

Hundreds of people from all across Los Angeles came to speak at the to offer their input on the for Universal Studios held at the Van Nuys City Hall Council Chambers on Tuesday. The meeting lasted all day and more than 200 people attended.

The number of speakers seemed to take Theodore Irving of the Planning Department by surprise. He was planning on an hour lunch break, but then amended that, saying, “We’re going to work through lunch because I have 70 more speakers signed up.” 

Many of the speakers came from the local neighborhoods—particularly Studio City, Toluca Lake, Hollywood, Cahuenga Pass, North Hollywood and Sherman Oaks. A majority of the audience seemed in support of the project when people were lined out the door at 9 a.m. They wore stickers with “YES!” showing support for the massive project that would redevelop nearly 300 acres of Universal Studios in the east San Fernando Valley.

“I don’t know who all these people are who are in support of this, and how they knew about this hearing,” told Studio City Patch shortly after he walked into the hearing room. Walker said he found out about the hearing quite by accident while attending a private affair where NBC Universal President Ron Meyer mentioned it. Walker, in turn, notified City Councilman Paul Krekorian’s office staff—and they were equally surprised about the public hearing. Both Walker and about the hearing late last week and that was reflected in the homeowners groups and neighborhood council representatives in attendance.

“The Studio City Neighborhood Council put together an extensive report of the that this plan would have on our community and it’s unimaginable that this could continue without any response to the list of negative impacts we have identified,” Walker testified at the hearing.

“None of us who worked on this extensive report got any notification of this hearing, and I find that highly suspicious,” Walker said.

The hearing was to collect feedback, reports, letters, questions, complaints, petitions, and all other kinds of data for the Planning Commission and the politicians who will eventually decide on whether to approve any or all of the expansion, which would include land within the city limits and in unincorporated Los Angeles County. A tentative hearing for that decision is set for Sept. 27.

Representatives from Universal Studios made a 20-minute presentation with slides, explaining how this plan was in development for more than a dozen years and more than 10,000 full- or part-time jobs as well as 30 unions are employed at Universal Studios, one of the world’s largest movie studio backlots. They are celebrating 100 years of filming in the Valley this year.

“We took a hard look at the residential units we wanted to build with the project and decided to eliminate the proposed 2,937 units,” said George Milstein, who is representing the $3 billion project for Universal. “We did not make that decision lightly...  but it will reduce the environmental impact and we hope [by eliminating it] that will move the project along.”

The additional housing was one of the biggest objections for the local community groups concerned about the traffic, the sewage and the schools. Nearby schools such as Rio Vista Elementary School in Toluca Lake and Walter Reed Middle School in Studio City would be most affected, along with Valley View Elementary School in the Cahuenga Pass.

“It’s the jobs that are important,” said Russell C. Nordstedt, of IATSE Local 80. “This will bring thousands of jobs to the area, and many of them will be permanent.”

Chuck Cortez, of the plaster shop workers union, said he represents 320 skilled workers who have regular jobs at Universal. Ed Duffy, representing teamsters and costumers based in North Hollywood, said the project should be expedited “especially in these economically competitive times.”

But Rachel Torres, representing 1,000 hotel workers of Local 11, expressed skepticism.

“There are retail venues and two 500-room hotels, but we want to see if there are good jobs,” she said.

Marian Dodge represented homeowners for the Federation of Hillside and Canyon Associations and the animals for the Friends of Griffith Park, said there were many species of bats that could be affected by the construction. She also said she was concerned about a mountain lion that is missing in the area that is looking for a mate.

, chief of staff of City Councilmember Tom LaBonge said the councilman had reservations about the project with the nearly 3,000 units of housing, but after that was eliminated, “he applauds Universal focusing on their core business: movies and tourism.”

Spokespeople from the Los Angeles Business Council, the mayor’s office, and various chambers of commerce spoke in favor of the project. Spokespeople from Friends of the L.A. River, bike path advocates and various environmental groups spoke against the project—even at the reduced level.

“This will have an enormous impact on us,” said Krista Michaels, a director with the Cahuenga Pass Property Owners Association, who owns the Design Works sign company nearby. “I think the project is still too large.”

She pointed out that traffic congestion is at a maximum already, and proposed digital billboards in the area are “considered to be a blight.”

Michelle Gilstrap of the Universal City-North Hollywood Chamber said the proposal follows current city plans for the future growth of the area and they endorse the Evolution Plan. Likewise, Richard Creamer of Sherman Oaks said, “The millions of dollars spent will help Studio City and the entire area” and the project shouldn’t be delayed.

Residents of Blair Drive, where the homes overlook the studio backlot, were concerned that the proposed addition of the “Harry Potter” ride would create more noise and traffic for the area.

“We understand that progress needs to be made,” said homeowner Lisa M. Stang. “But Universal is surrounded by residents and we are affected by the daily activities.”

She talked about noise from explosions from loops in the theme park as well as film production noise until 4 a.m.

Neighbor said he had a guest at his house on Blair Drive, where he lived since 1978, who was traumatized by a pyrotechnic explosion in the middle of the night and a woman screaming, “Help, please, I’m being killed” over and over.

“My visitor suffered post-traumatic stress disorder,” Gombar said. “There are car crashes, explosions and other disturbances 24 hours a day.”

But, neighbor Bert Champagne, who works for AIDS Walk L.A., said the studio has helped support many charities “and I will support the Universal Evolution for the rest of my life.”

spoke against the proposal, but encouraged the studio to remain vibrant and active. His wife, Beth, who is involved in the Studio City Beautification Association also showed support, as well as Studio City Neighborhood Council Safety chairman Richard Adams.

And, longtime activist Art Howard said that the neighborhoods in Studio City and the area would not only be affected by increased traffic, but “the ambient lighting from the extra signage will cause light pollution on their homes.”

Skraeling August 15, 2012 at 08:15 PM
Sounds good to me. Perhaps people should be given fair market value for those hill homes. North Hollywood is ripe for urban renewal with lots of slum housing that could be removed and new homes built LA needs this type of development..Frankly, I don't give a damn about bats, and chose, years ago, to not live in the hills. For once, let LA do the right thing. Lord knows, they City Council has rarely done anything right, or honestly.
Irene Gibson August 15, 2012 at 09:06 PM
Looks as if this is not a good move for the community. City Council should turn it down.
Tuomas R Morgan August 16, 2012 at 01:00 AM
As a No-Ho homeowner, I was invited onto a mailing list and meeting schedule a few years ago. I have been constantly updated and kept informed of developements from the get go by Universal Studios. As I understand it, the impact on the environment, traffic, noise, quality of life, etc. has all been carefully studied and taken into account. It will create good paying jobs for the immediate area. In this city when neighborhood streets are temporarily blocked off for film shoots, instead of complaining, people should be thankful for the jobs and money that comes pouring into our local economy. Other locations spend millions trying to attract that money to their cities and away from Hollywood. Hollywood needs to stay Hollywood. You can't fight progress.
robert August 16, 2012 at 03:35 AM
I just seen on the news that production in los angeles has dropped over 60% and we are losing millions in revenue. We need this project amd honestly, I can care less about the bats/lions/lights. Its all just whining to me because they can't get everything they want. And if you have a home next to a theme park, then what do you expect? You should just move then. This isn't burgerking. You can't have everything your way.
larry August 16, 2012 at 07:58 PM
The plan done right will cement this area as the number one entertainment and production area in the World and allow new prosperity and wonderful jobs for the surrounding community....Times are tough, and we need to protect all our futures. I say yes , but verify.


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »